On Punching Nazis and other hyperbole
May. 24th, 2017 03:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm willing to sing about punching Nazis, but I'm not willing to seriously advocate that doing so (or censoring them) is ethically and morally right.
Ken White (Popehat) has an excellent post as to why not. (oddly enough, -do- read the comments here).
Ken White (Popehat) has an excellent post as to why not. (oddly enough, -do- read the comments here).
Re: On the no-platforming of Nazis
Date: 2017-06-01 09:00 am (UTC)Which is another way of saying that depriving a person of access to a particular platform isn't censorship, right?
Anyway, the US government restricts speech for all kinds of reasons. Did you know that obscenity is still unprotected speech, and legally censorable? The definition of what's considered obscene has narrowed over time, though. And "fighting words" are still unprotected, which might have relevance to the issue of what sorts of things one can say that might lead to a riot.
Anyway, the line separating protected from unprotected speech has shifted over the 200-odd years that the First Amendment has existed, and it would be irrational to assume that we happen to have arrived at the perfect balance right now.