Has anyone else ever noticed that there are certain color words that feel like they -should- be onemonapeic (or onemonapigmentic, anyway) -- but aren't -- because they actually stand for another color entirely?
Any idea why? (ok, Puce is easy; it should be an awful yellow or yellow-green color (and oddly, Firefox translates puce as a light green). But it isn't; it's a niceish dark pink biot sure why my hindbrain is convinced that chartreuse should be a red or purplish color, not a green).
Are there any others people can think of?
Any idea why? (ok, Puce is easy; it should be an awful yellow or yellow-green color (and oddly, Firefox translates puce as a light green). But it isn't; it's a niceish dark pink biot sure why my hindbrain is convinced that chartreuse should be a red or purplish color, not a green).
Are there any others people can think of?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 08:28 pm (UTC)On the other hand, cerise should be a shade of blue a bit brighter than cerulean instead of pink (cherries be damned), khaki should be olive-green instead of tan, and periwinkle, albeit pretty close, should be the color of the plant of that name.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 11:25 pm (UTC)I don't want to think about puce.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-15 01:31 am (UTC)Going with the most common onomotopoaic patterns, I think I'd expect people to map low vowels to darker colors and high vowels to lighter/brighter colors. I wonder if that happens?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-15 01:04 pm (UTC)http://hibiscus-sinensis.com/regency/colors.htm