So, let's see, assuming that they're consistantly using "paladin" as a synonym for LG Fighter, I think something's fishy...
Fighters are 70% good, but only 30% LG, meaning 40% of them are CG or NG. Since Fighters are 20% of the total, they account for 8% of the 35% total in NG and CG, leaving 27% for the 80% of the population that aren't fighters. Re-normalizing, we see that ~34% of non-Fighters are CG or LG. OK, that's not fishy at all. Maybe I was wrong.
On the other axis, we see that Fighters are 30% likely to be LN or LE, accounting for 6% of the population. So non-Fighters are ~17.5% likely to be LN or LE. I guess it's plausible that Fighters are much more likely than others to be LE or LN, but it's certaiunly interesting. Since the Rouge prevalence is only 10% of the total, thier aversion to Law doesn't explain the result.
no subject
Fighters are 70% good, but only 30% LG, meaning 40% of them are CG or NG. Since Fighters are 20% of the total, they account for 8% of the 35% total in NG and CG, leaving 27% for the 80% of the population that aren't fighters. Re-normalizing, we see that ~34% of non-Fighters are CG or LG. OK, that's not fishy at all. Maybe I was wrong.
On the other axis, we see that Fighters are 30% likely to be LN or LE, accounting for 6% of the population. So non-Fighters are ~17.5% likely to be LN or LE. I guess it's plausible that Fighters are much more likely than others to be LE or LN, but it's certaiunly interesting. Since the Rouge prevalence is only 10% of the total, thier aversion to Law doesn't explain the result.